20187. Adulteration and Misbranding of butter. U.S. v. 90 Cases of Butter. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product re- leased under bond to be re-worked. (F. & D. no. 29061. Sample no. 16685-A.) This action involved the interstate shipment of a quantity of butter, samples of which were found to contain less than 80 percent by weight of milk fat, the standard prescribed by Congress. On September 23,1932, the United States attorney for the Southern District of Florida, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 90 cases of butter, remaining in the original unbroken packages at Jacksonville, Fla., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about September 12, 1932, by Jefferson Creamery, from Ashburn, Ga., to Jacksonville, Fla., and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part: "Land O'Sunshine Butter, * * * Jefferson Creamery, Ashburn, Georgia." It was alleged in the libel that the article was adulterated in that a product containing less than 80 percent by weight of milk fat had been mixed and packed therewith so as to reduce, lower, or injuriously affect its quality or strength, and had been substituted wholly or in part for butter, a product which should contain not less than 80 percent by weight of milk fat as required by act of March 4, 1923. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the article was offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the statement "Butter", appearing on the label, was false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser, since the product contained less than 80 percent by weight of milk fat. On September 29, 1932, the Jefferson Creamery, Ashburn, Ga., claimant, having admitted the allegations of the libel and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant for reworking under the supervision of this Department, upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond in the sum of $500, conditioned that the milk fat content be brought up to at least 80 percent, and that it should not be sold or disposed of contrary to the provisions of the Food and Drugs Act or the laws of any State. R. G. TUGWBLL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.