097. Misbi-anding of cottonseed meal and cottonseed cake. TJ. S. v. 300 
Sacks of Cottonseed Meal and 100 Sacks of Cottonseed Cake. Con- 
sent decree of condemnation entered. Product i'eleased under 
bond.     (F. & D. No. 21395.    I. S. No3. 12542-x, 12543-x.    S. No. W-2044.)
On November 30, 1926, the United States attorney for the District of Colo- 
do, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District 
>urt of the United States for said district a libel praying seizure and con- 
femnation of 300 sacks of cottonseed meal and 100 sacks of cottonseed cake, 
raining in the original unbroken packages at Denver, Colo, consigned by the 
Illicothe Cotton Oil Co., Chillicothe, Tex., alleging that the articles had been 
Lipped from Chillicothe, Tex., on or about October 26, 1926, and transported 
?m the State of Texas into the State of Colorado, and charging misbranding 
^violation of the food and drugs act.    The articles were labeled in part: 
3% Protein Cracked Cottonseed Meal"   (or "Cake")   "Manufactured By 
illicothe Cotton Oil Company Chillicothe, Texas Guaranteed Analysis Crude 
tein not less than 43.00 per cent." 
;Jt was alleged in the libel that the articles were misbranded, in that the 
tement " Guaranteed Analysis Crude Protein not less than 43.00 per cent," 
Sane on the label, was false and misleading and deceived and misled the pur. 
ser, since the said articles did not contain 43 per cent of protein. 
On Febniary 4, 1927, the Chillicothe Cotton Oil Co., Chillicothe, Tex., claim- 
it, having admitted the allegations of the libel and consented to the entry of 
ent of condemnation, and having executed a bond in the sum of $500, 
-n.dition.ed that the products not be sold or otherwise disposed of contrary to 
le law, a decree was entered ordering that the said products be delivered to 
claimant upon payment of the costs of the proceedings.
W. M. JAEDINE, Secretary of Agriculture.