5969. Misbranding of cottonseed .meal and cottonseed feed Meal. U. S. * * * for Caisa.Campobello Oil Mill, a corporation. Plea of guilty. Pine, $50. (F. & D. No 8308. I. S. Nos. 2716-m, 2787-m, 2788-m, 2789-m.) On August 16, 1917, the United States attorney for the Western District of South Carolina, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district an information against the Campobello Oil Mill, a corporation, Campobello, S. C, alleging shipment by said company, in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, on or about October 26, 1916, January 10, 1917, January 13, 1917, and January 15, 1917, from the State of South Carolina into the State of North Carolina, of quantities of cottonseed meal in the first shipment and cottonseed feed meal in the other shipments, which were misbranded. Analyses of samples of the articles by the Bureau of Chemistry of this department showed the following results: Shipment of Oct. 96. Jan. 19. Jan, 13. Jan. IS. Protein (NX 6.25) (percent) 33.1 33.2 31.8 32.9 Crude fiber (per cent) 11.2 Misbranding of the cottonseed meal was alleged in substance in the informa- tion for the reason that the statement borne on the tags attached to the sacks regarding the article and the ingredients and substances contained therein, to wit, " Guaranteed Analysis ' "• • Protein 38.62 per cent '- v "• Max. Crude Fiber 10.00 per cent," was false and misleading in that it represented that the article contained not less than 38.62 per cent of protein and not more than 10 per cent of crude fiber, and for the further reason that it was labeled as aforesaid so as to deceive and mislead purchasers into the belief that it con- tained not less than 38.62 per cent of protein and not more than 10 per cent of crude fiber, whereas, in truth and in fact, it contained less than 38.62 per cent of protein and more than 10 per cent of crude fiber, to wit, 33.1 per cent of protein and 11.2 per cent of crude fiber. Misbranding of the cottonseed feed meal in the other shipments was alleged for the reason that the statements borne on the tags attached to the sacks regarding the article and the ingredients and substances contained therein, to wit, " Guaranteed Analysis >! •' * Protein 36.00 per cent," was false and misleading in that it represented that the article contained not less than 36 per cent of protein, and for the further reason that it was labeled as aforesaid so as to deceive and mislead purchasers into the belief that it contained not less than 36 per cent of protein, whereas, in truth and in fact, it contained less than 36 per cent of protein, to wit, 33.2 per cent, 31.8 per cent, or 32.9 per cent of protein, as the case might be. On September 14, 1917, the defendant company filed its answer admitting the allegations of the information, and the court imposed a fine of $50. GAEL VROOMAN, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.