159. Adulteration and misbranding of quinine sulfate. TJ. S. v. 132 Bottles of Quinine Sulfate. Default decree of condemnation and destruction. (F. D. C. No. 1313. Sample No. 84280-D.) This product contained moisture in excess of the amount specified by the United States Pharmacopoeia. The containers were deceptive since their contents occupied only about 89 percent of the capacity of the bottles. Most of the bottles examined contained less than the amount indicated by the label. On or about January 15, 1940, the United States attorney for the Western District of Arkansas filed a libel against 132 bottles of quinine sulfate at Port Smith, Ark., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on September 18, 1939, by the Frank Tea & Spice Distributing Co. from Cincinnati, Ohio; and charging that it was adulterated and. misbranded. The article was alleged to be adulterated in that it purported to be and was represented as a drug the name of which is recognized in the United States Pharmacopoeia and its strength differed from and its quality fell below the standard set forth in the said pharmacopoeia since the moisture content was 8.9 percent; whereas the pharmacopoeia specifies that quinine sulfate shall contain not more than 5 percent moisture. Misbranding was alleged in that representations appearing in the labeling that the article was U. S. P. X. quinine sulfate and contained about 15 percent water of crystallization and complied with tests laid down in the U. S. Pharma- copoeia for quinine sulfate, were false and misleading. The article was alleged to be misbranded further in that the statement "No. ?," borne on the wrapper and carton, meant that the bottles contained V8 ounce, and was false and mislead- ing since it was incorrect. It was alleged to be misbranded further in that the containers were so made, formed, or filled as to be misleading. On March 25, 1940, no claimant having appeared, judgment of condemnation was entered and it was ordered that the product be destroyed.